Automated failover/failback was in the news recently with the FalconStor RecoverTrac data mobility upgrade. How common is this type of technology today? Is failover/failback becoming any less of a pain point for IT?
Failover and failback technologies have existed for quite some time. The thing that makes FalconStor so unique is that they have moved failover/failback automation into disaster recovery software. Failover and failback capabilities have traditionally been regarded as disaster avoidance capabilities rather than disaster recovery capabilities. As such, it is a bit outside of the norm for a backup vendor to take on failover/failback automation.
Failover/failback has always been a major pain point for admins. Fortunately, the various software vendors have taken steps to make failover and failback more intelligent so as to reduce the administrator's workload. For example, rules can be used to ensure that all of the virtual machines that are associated with a business application can failover together. There are also technologies available to assign new IP addresses after a failover and to make any required changes to DNS records.
Dig Deeper on Disaster recovery storage
Related Q&A from Brien Posey
Staying current with the latest Windows updates is a difficult task, but IT can accomplish this without harming the UX with Group Policy, disk ... Continue Reading
IT professionals should deploy Group Policies to their browsers to improve the user experience. Check out this step-by-step guide on applying Group ... Continue Reading
The ability to share GPUs among multiple virtual desktop instances has contributed to a rise in GPU use in many VDI deployments. Continue Reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.