freshidea - Fotolia
Bidirectional transactional replication in a Microsoft environment refers to a multimaster replication topology that is sometimes used with SQL Server.
Large organizations may occasionally need to create scale-out databases so duplicate copies of data reside in multiple places for performance or business continuity purposes.
While this goal could seemingly be accomplished with traditional unidirectional replication, such an architecture would be unlikely to meet the needs of a multi-facility organization. In such a situation, an employee in a branch office would be able to read data from a local database server, but write operations would have to be redirected to a central database server in the main office.
Three-way bidirectional transactional replication eliminates this problem by creating a multimaster architecture that allows write operations to be performed against any of the database copies.
For this type of replication to work, the server at the main office is designated as a central subscriber. The branch office database servers subscribe to the central subscriber. If an update to a database record is made at a branch office, the update is sent to the central subscriber, which then replicates the change to the remaining database server.
Although bidirectional transactional replication generally works well, conflicts occasionally occur. For instance, a conflict can arise if a record is inserted into a key table on one server, but another server already has a record that uses the same key.
Another way in which a conflict can occur is if a record is updated at the same time on two different servers. This holds true even if the update was made to different columns within the record. Fortunately, these conflicts can be prevented programmatically. Microsoft provides a list of suggested actions.
When to consider bidirectional replication for disaster recovery
Replication as part of a backup/DR strategy
Dig Deeper on Disaster recovery planning - management
Related Q&A from Brien Posey
Hyper-V and VMware are in a perpetual battle for supremacy in the virtualization market. Although the two hypervisors have similar features, ... Continue Reading
Thin clients are less expensive than PCs, but they also come with limitations. Find out if thin clients will work well within your organization. Continue Reading
Know software compatibility, maximum scalability and long-term potential of hardware support from vendors before buying a hyper-converged ... Continue Reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.