You are using terminology that doesn't quite fit with the solution. BCVs are really an EMC designation for their mirror copies. With Network Appliance, you would take a point-in-time copy of a file system (which roughly equates to a LUN in their structure) and then make a copy of that over another interface. Since they implement a log-structure file system called WAFL (write anywhere file layout) only modified data consumes space so the idea of reserving an entire volume isn't really applicable for the copy.
Yes, this does work and has been deployed. Don't confuse the ability to make a remote copy with a DR solution. The remote copy is just one thing that is needed. The application recovery/restart mechanics that encompass many other requirements must be considered for disaster recovery.
Evaluator Group, Inc.
Editor's note: Do you agree with this expert's response? If you have more to share, post it in our Storage Networking discussion forum.
Dig Deeper on Disaster recovery planning - management
Related Q&A from Randy Kerns
What is the one hidden gotcha that you'd advise users about if they were shopping for an all-flash storage array? Continue Reading
How much control do you have with all-flash storage arrays? How much control do you have over how arrays handle your data? Do you control the caching? Continue Reading
Vendors often publish numbers for 'usable' capacity versus 'effective' capacity. Can you explain this and how can you plan flash capacity needs with ... Continue Reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.