Access your Pro+ Content below.
Companies have high expectations for their disaster recovery test plan
This article is part of the March 2014 Vol. 13 No. 1 issue of Storage magazine
Disaster recovery is now a standard fixture in most data centers; our most recent survey finds 77% of respondent organizations have a disaster recovery test plan in place. Once considered an insurance policy only well-heeled companies could afford, disaster recovery (DR) is now standard fare in most data centers. In our recent survey, 77% of respondent organizations said they have a DR test plan in place, just a few percentage points higher than two years ago. Most (61%) of those plans cover mission-critical applications, but 36% say their DR strategy protects all their company's apps. A DR plan's recovery point objective defines how much data can be lost without problems; 26% of those surveyed had zero tolerance for any data loss, but 30% could forfeit a day's worth. A recovery time objective is how long a recovery will take; 78% said 24 hours or less, but 14% expect lickety-split recoveries of an hour or less. Those numbers are demanding, but with server virtualization and cloud services, recoveries are faster and more ...
Access this Pro+ Content for Free!
Features in this issue
Whether your company is using public, hybrid or a private storage cloud, you need tools to manage, monitor and keep track of the stored data.
Storage networks are struggling with virtualized server environments and flash storage. Your company's storage network may need a major upgrade.
In our ninth annual Quality Awards survey for enterprise arrays, Fujitsu didn't just make the cut; it took the cake by earning top honors.
Disaster recovery is a standard fixture in most data centers; our most recent survey finds 77% of respondent organizations have a DR plan in place.
Columns in this issue
It seems as if every vendor has a mystic on staff who can predict the future of the storage industry. Here's what they think we can look forward to.
Maybe there really is something behind all this "software-defined storage" talk -- but maybe it doesn't mean what I think it means.
The first collaboration and file-sharing services were cloud-based, but firms might be more comfortable with hybrid or on-premises implementations.
New products designed from the ground up to specifically serve storage for virtual servers can offer dramatic savings in terms of dollars and the time spent managing storage.